Value-added services
boost Europe's $1.19bn radiology equipment services market
From Frost
& Sullivan
The servicing and maintenance of medical
imaging equipment remains a necessary 'evil' for healthcare institutions
aiming to minimise the risks of downtime, revenue loss and increased
waitinglists. Entering a comprehensive service agreement for each piece of
installed kit is a costly undertaking and puts a severe dent in the value
of radiology or clinical engineering service budgets.
Benign growth prospects in most imaging
modality markets, with the notable exception of a few types such as
positron emission tomography (PET), do not automatically render the
service centre synonymous with a profit centre.
Faced with mounting pressure from
governmental health policies and healthcare insurance companies to
reduce spending, service providers are scrambling to strengthen finances
and to develop profitability potential.
Traditionally, in an industry inextricably
linked to the installations of medical imaging equipment itself, the
original equipment manufacturer (OEM) would service its own equipment.
However, a new study by Frost &
Sullivan stresses that the advent of a new generation of service solutions
— including multi-vendor, shared and managed equipment services — has
heightened the appeal of outsourcing the service and maintenance elements
of radiology to a third party.
The change in service delivery with new
value-added services, including ongoing training, consultancy and
out-of-hours services, may boost areas currently outside of the medical
imaging equipment services spectrum.
Frost & Sullivan expects the arrival of
value-added services to be instrumental in redefining services and
expanding portfolios to effectively meet customer needs and to sustain
momentum in the $1.19 billion European medical imaging equipment services
market.
"With the uptake of these flexible
services still in its infancy, it is difficult to define the potential in
terms of numbers. We will have to wait and see if the popularity of
managed equipment services and multi-vendor services in some regions can
spread Europe-wide", reports Dr Sohail Sheikh, Programme Manager at
Frost & Sullivan.
Persuading end-users that the benefits are
worth the outlay is a major hurdle which OEM service centres and
departments must overcome — not an easy task with budgets already
squeezed. Healthcare institutions are naturally suspicious of extra
services and value-for-money has to be proven in order for the product or
service to be adopted.
In line with the cost containment policies,
healthcare institutions are now implementing business practices in order
to assess and manage risk effectively. These methods are intended to aid
cost minimisation and streamlining processes for both core and non-core
areas of healthcare.
"By assessing the costs involved in
service and maintenance of medical imaging equipment, many radiology
departments and hospital administrations seek to drive down the prices of
the individual service contracts. The trend of business practice in
healthcare environments will continue to deliver a restraining effect on
the price of service contracts over the forecast period", Dr Sheikh
explains.
The past few years have seen a rapid
increase in the number of modalities which can be networked due to their
digital capabilities and connectivity. Service centres have been quick to
respond by boosting their own remote diagnostics centres and developing
greater expertise for planned, preventative, and reactive maintenance in a
remote setting.
Frost & Sullivan urges service
providers to address the challenge of providing an efficient,
cost-effective service through remote access and connectivity, while also
satisfying customers' needs for a more hands-on personal approach.
Predicted to reach a revenue level of $1.27
billion by 2009, the European medical imaging equipment services market is
dominated by the large OEMs, namely GE Medical Systems, Philips Medical
Systems and Siemens Medical Systems. Jointly capturing a 90 percent slice
of this highly concentrated market, these three heavyweights have the
latest technology in their service centres and large numbers of field
engineers at their disposal.
Frost & Sullivan's study adds that
these companies preside over the largest installed base of medical imaging
equipment throughout Europe and command a high degree of customer
loyalty when it comes to the service and maintenance of the majority of
their equipment. The study also points to the large number of small local
players, often confined to a region only, who offer services for
particular imaging modalities and are able to compete on price and
location of their service engineers in the field.
The provision of multi-vendor services,
including the entire breadth of modalities, plays an important role as a
key competitive differentiator for the top three companies. The market is
furthermore populated by single-vendors who service their own equipment
only, such as Toshiba Medical Systems. Other vendors may be limited to a
single modality only, which encompasses many of the ultrasound vendors in
the field.
Many areas of radiology are nearing
saturation in terms of the installed base for imaging modalities,
inhibiting growth in the European medical imaging equipment services
market. Only relatively new technologies such as PET scanners, now being
adopted in the clinical environment, are displaying bright growth
prospects. This is reflected in the distribution of service centre
revenues. In regions such as Germany and Scandinavia, for example, the
market is a replacement one due to the high levels of installed equipment,
a severe limiting factor for the growth of services in this arena.
More information: http://frost.com

|